<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for An independent PR and digital agency | Kaizo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kaizo.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kaizo.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:20:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on It’s official: The female of the species is brighter than the male by Gillybilly</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2010/02/26/girlsvsboys/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillybilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1323#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Love this .... and so true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this &#8230;. and so true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is the PS3 old, fat and stupid or is this a clever marketing ploy by Sony? by Chris Hoult</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2010/03/04/is-the-ps3-old-fat-and-stupid-or-is-this-a-clever-marketing-ploy-by-sony/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hoult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1367#comment-676</guid>
		<description>I suppose we will never know what really happened but I doubt that this was a deliberate ploy by Sony. These console gamers should try online PC gaming to avoid problems like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose we will never know what really happened but I doubt that this was a deliberate ploy by Sony. These console gamers should try online PC gaming to avoid problems like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does the fact that there is nine times more offline than online Word of Mouth surprise you? by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2010/02/05/wom/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1270#comment-587</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by neilhallmark: Kaizo blog: Does the fact that there is 9 times more offline than online Word of Mouth surprise you? http://bit.ly/a1kp4I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by neilhallmark: Kaizo blog: Does the fact that there is 9 times more offline than online Word of Mouth surprise you? <a href="http://bit.ly/a1kp4I..." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a1kp4I&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s your Wikipedia strategy? by Neil Hallmark</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2009/12/10/wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hallmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1193#comment-506</guid>
		<description>Harry,

Thanks for your comment. It’s true, Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopaedia and Wikipedia makes it perfectly clear that entries should be written in a neutral style without any kind of sales or marketing language. However, there have been many high-profile cases of Wikipedia articles being vandalised and false information posted (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webuser.co.uk/news/top-stories/431410/thierry-henry-s-wikipedia-page-defaced&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thierry Henry is a perfect recent example&lt;/a&gt;). In a world in which anyone with access to the internet can praise or condemn a person or brand in a matter of seconds, it is good business practice to have a strategy in place to first of all identify what is being said, and secondly how to respond. Wikipedia is just another channel that brands need to be aware of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. It’s true, Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopaedia and Wikipedia makes it perfectly clear that entries should be written in a neutral style without any kind of sales or marketing language. However, there have been many high-profile cases of Wikipedia articles being vandalised and false information posted (<a href="http://www.webuser.co.uk/news/top-stories/431410/thierry-henry-s-wikipedia-page-defaced" rel="nofollow">Thierry Henry is a perfect recent example</a>). In a world in which anyone with access to the internet can praise or condemn a person or brand in a matter of seconds, it is good business practice to have a strategy in place to first of all identify what is being said, and secondly how to respond. Wikipedia is just another channel that brands need to be aware of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s your Wikipedia strategy? by Harry Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2009/12/10/wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1193#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Glad you added your word of caution there. &quot;defer the changes to non-conflicted users&quot;. More information on this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest

I have to say the whole idea of corporate &quot;strategizing&quot; on wikipedia raises hackles.  It&#039;s supposed to be an encyclopaedia, not a business directory or marketing channel.  But wikipedia is very influential as you say, and I guess where there is influence, there are always strategies to channel that influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you added your word of caution there. &#8220;defer the changes to non-conflicted users&#8221;. More information on this here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest</a></p>
<p>I have to say the whole idea of corporate &#8220;strategizing&#8221; on wikipedia raises hackles.  It&#8217;s supposed to be an encyclopaedia, not a business directory or marketing channel.  But wikipedia is very influential as you say, and I guess where there is influence, there are always strategies to channel that influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s your Wikipedia strategy? by steve virgin</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2009/12/10/wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>steve virgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1193#comment-503</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil

http://wp.me/yKdL Here is your article reposted on my site

www.virginonmedia.wordpress.com

It was a pleasure to come and meet you all. I hope we can find many ways in which we can work together.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil</p>
<p><a href="http://wp.me/yKdL" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/yKdL</a> Here is your article reposted on my site</p>
<p><a href="http://www.virginonmedia.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.virginonmedia.wordpress.com</a></p>
<p>It was a pleasure to come and meet you all. I hope we can find many ways in which we can work together.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s your Wikipedia strategy? by Neil Hallmark</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2009/12/10/wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hallmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1193#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

Yes of course. Feel free to use on your site.

Thanks,
Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>Yes of course. Feel free to use on your site.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s your Wikipedia strategy? by steve virgin</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2009/12/10/wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>steve virgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1193#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Can I have permission to repost your story above on my blog? With a link back to this site of course...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I have permission to repost your story above on my blog? With a link back to this site of course&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Was the BBC right to invite Nick Griffin onto BBC Question Time? No &#8211; A contravention and controversial by Was the BBC right to invite Nick Griffin onto BBC Question Time? &#124; An independent PR and digital agency &#124; Kaizo</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2009/10/23/no-a-contravention-and-controversial/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Was the BBC right to invite Nick Griffin onto BBC Question Time? &#124; An independent PR and digital agency &#124; Kaizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1112#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] No &#8211; A contravention and controversial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No &#8211; A contravention and controversial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Was the BBC right to invite Nick Griffin onto BBC Question Time? Yes &#8211; A duty of access by Was the BBC right to invite Nick Griffin onto BBC Question Time? &#124; An independent PR and digital agency &#124; Kaizo</title>
		<link>http://www.kaizo.net/2009/10/23/yes-a-duty-of-access/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Was the BBC right to invite Nick Griffin onto BBC Question Time? &#124; An independent PR and digital agency &#124; Kaizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaizo.net/?p=1108#comment-438</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes – A duty of access [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes – A duty of access [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
